Closed tinuzz closed 4 years ago
"... and this parser is in fact making it more difficult."
Yes and No. Have you ever tried the old module without a parser and used an assign rule?
But it's a point, not to parse every attribute.
Hi,
No I have just started out using this module to configure Icinga2, so I don't have any insight in how it is an improvement over earlier iterations. Yesterday, I added some service groups using assign rules and that just worked, so it's not all bad.
However, to adhere more to POLA, I would recommend to make this parser opt-in, rather than opt-out. I would think it would be extremely easy to put all of its functionality in a function, and if you want to use it, you'd just wrap your attribute values in a single function call. That would be so much more intuitive and less error-prone than to disable the parser by prefixing the value with "-:".
Of course, the default behaviour is hard to change without breaking existing code, but maybe adding a function to call the parser and providing an option to disable it by default could be helpful. I think I would use that.
Best regards, Martijn.
The discussion isn't new. For which scope this on/off option should belong? An attribute, an object and to all its attributes or globally.
Since a year I'd like to redesign the parser but ... no one gives time to me.
The discussion isn't new. For which scope this on/off option should belong? An attribute, an object and to all its attributes or globally.
I'm not sure I understand the full scope of this question, but intuitively, I would say "globally". When the parser is turned off by default, the only way to have it do anything, is to call it by function. Does that sound reasonable?
First of all, it affects all attributes that are also used for preparatory work such as passwords to filling databases.
It becomes problematic if someone does not use schema_import, but still switches off the parser or uses constants.
So we break the API and I set this to v3.0.0, the up coming release (2.4.2 moved to 3.0.0)
... and all password attributes don't will be parsed.
feature/elasticsearch feature/icingadb feature/idomysql feature/idopgsql feature/influxdb object/apiuser
The feature::idomysql class had a parameter '$password'. Its value is used twice:
This leads to a conflict.
I have a password containing a ')', which is mangled by the parser into something syntactically invalid.
leads to syntactically broken configuration, and
leads to inability to import the schema, because the password is wrong.
Trying to parse password values doesn't seem sensible to me. This is a similar issue to #572.
I think this parser, if you insist on keeping it enabled by default, should at the very least, make 100% sure that it doesn't generate syntactically invalid configuration. One of the major points of creating abstractions in Puppet is to take the burden of messing with application-specific configuration syntax away from the user and this parser is in fact making it more difficult.
Regards, Martijn.