Open runejuhl opened 4 years ago
What's the @voxpupuli convention when making changes with backward-incompatible changes? Any chance of getting this merged in the near future?
@runejuhl It is hard to merge this because it has backward compatible changes by adding data types to the class parameters. This is a very good thing, thank you! Since the PR only changes some of the parameters, it cannot easily be merged because someone else then needs to change the remaining ones. If you could add types to the other parameters, we could definitely get this merged. As it is now, it will probably languish unless someone else wants to checkout your work and then do the rest on top of it.
Hi @ghoneycutt
Thank you for the comment. I'll try to find some time to put a bit more work into this PR in the not too distant future ...which will probably end up becoming the "not really near future" :wink:
Dear @runejuhl, thanks for the PR!
This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?
You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks
Dear @runejuhl, thanks for the PR!
This is pccibot, your friendly Vox Pupuli GitHub Bot. I noticed that your pull request contains merge conflict. Can you please rebase?
You can find my sourcecode at voxpupuli/vox-pupuli-tasks
Adds stricter types for
onboot
,hotplug
and certain bonding parameters.Also fixes issue in
opts-redhat.erb
when passed a non-string/non-enumerable value. See https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-network/compare/master...runejuhl:add-stricter-types?expand=1#diff-6114de1a6f90ec85830d2eab0f0815f7R3 .