Closed crazymind1337 closed 3 years ago
and this doesn't affect any other Debian type OS?
and this doesn't affect any other Debian type OS?
Ah you are right. Just did check for our needs. I will check also for other OSes later this day. Thanks for reminding!
@igalic I checked other supported OSes (using latest docker container). At Debian the virtualenv
binary is not used and on latest CentOS virtualenv
does still have the --no-site-packages
option.
I've missed this PR and made a new one: https://github.com/voxpupuli/puppet-python/pull/552
I think it doesn't make sense to check for any OS version, as --no-site-packages
is deprecated since a long time.
(see https://virtualenv.pypa.io/en/16.7.9/reference.html)
The default has changed to not use site-packages anyways, so we don't need to be explicit here.
I've missed this PR and made a new one: #552
I think it doesn't make sense to check for any OS version, as
--no-site-packages
is deprecated since a long time. (see https://virtualenv.pypa.io/en/16.7.9/reference.html) The default has changed to not use site-packages anyways, so we don't need to be explicit here.
So i can close this one?
@crazymind1337 Good question.
@igalic What do you think?
i think we've accumulated a lot more feedback on what the best approach to solving this issue is in @saz's pr, so let's keep going there
Pull Request (PR) description
On Ubuntu 20.04 there is no parameter
--no-site-packages
forvirtualenv
binary anymore. The--system-site-packages
stays the same.This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
Fixes '--no-site-packages' parameter on Ubuntu Focal Fossa