Closed wyardley closed 6 months ago
@bastelfreak I'm guessing you'll like #997 better, but maybe this option is also worth considering -- despite making the tests a bit clunkier, it gets us closer to the original documented behavior and makes the actual module behavior more simple IMO. I'm good with either way (or open to other suggestions).
Pull Request (PR) description
This leaves some of the documentation about epel, and installs it for acceptance tests, but leaves it up to users on CentOS to include this separately if needed. (continuation of #996)
This Pull Request (PR) fixes the following issues
Fixes #995 Closes #997