Filling up the active container at the start under SOS is not doing full clause inter-reductions even if enabled.
We might want to do it for consistency, efficiency, and stronger invariants (e.g., "can't have two alpha-equivalent clauses in the forward subsumption index when FSub enabled, ...)
However, this is not a one-line fix, because forwardSimplify normally puts clause replacements into _newClauses from which travel to _unprocessed from which they normally go to _passive. So this long clause dispatch would need to be duplicated for the sake of addInputSOSClause or parametrized.
Filling up the active container at the start under SOS is not doing full clause inter-reductions even if enabled.
We might want to do it for consistency, efficiency, and stronger invariants (e.g., "can't have two alpha-equivalent clauses in the forward subsumption index when FSub enabled, ...)
However, this is not a one-line fix, because
forwardSimplifynormally puts clause replacements into_newClausesfrom which travel to_unprocessedfrom which they normally go to_passive. So this long clause dispatch would need to be duplicated for the sake ofaddInputSOSClauseor parametrized.