Open vrathi0 opened 3 months ago
(generated using Chat GPT)
The progression of IAS officers for eligibility to serve in central government roles across various Central Pay Commissions (CPC) has seen gradual refinement in the structuring of pay levels and career pathways. Here’s a detailed look from the 3rd to the 7th CPC:
The trajectory for IAS officers seeking central deputation has become more structured and transparent over time, particularly with the introductions in the 6th and 7th CPCs. The establishment of clear pay levels in the 7th CPC particularly aids in aligning career progression with predictable benchmarks. These changes reflect a broader goal to streamline career paths within the Indian civil service, ensuring officers are well-prepared and suitably experienced for their roles at the central level.
Each CPC has contributed to refining the administrative framework, adapting it to the changing needs of governance and the socio-economic environment in India. This progressive structuring helps in maintaining a robust administrative service capable of effectively managing both state and central governmental functions.
IAS officers are generally eligible for deputation to the central government after serving in their state cadres for a minimum period. The opportunity for central deputation depends on the level they have reached in their career, which is structured by the Central Pay Commissions. Here's how the promotion and deputation levels have been structured under the 6th and 7th Central Pay Commissions:
The 7th CPC maintained similar structures but introduced a more streamlined Pay Matrix system, replacing the earlier Pay Bands and Grade Pays. The approximate years of service required for deputation to central positions remained consistent, focusing on merit and vacancies. Here are the corresponding levels:
While both the 6th and 7th CPCs outline a progression that includes central deputation, the 7th CPC’s introduction of the Pay Matrix system has made the pay scales more transparent and predictable. The actual mechanics of career progression and deputation did not dramatically change between these commissions, but the simplification and increased clarity in pay levels under the 7th CPC have been significant improvements.
This career trajectory allows IAS officers to gradually prepare for and assume responsibilities at the central level, which requires a broad understanding of national issues and policies. The progression ensures that by the time officers reach these senior levels, they have accumulated substantial experience and expertise in governance and administration.
The thinking till now of district level matching between CS and politicians may be quite faulty. Following notes are after call with Priyamvad on 25th May 24
Broadly, three things might influence the movement of CS:
Possible ways to categories Bureaucrats:
Look at center or state budgets over time. Some departments would have higher budget allocation and therefore budget allocation can be a relative signal of importance. Some ministries might have better facilities and therefore would be more coveted (like PWD maybe) as compared to other departments where you are more or less on the sidelines (like culture promotion, national integration etc).
Some key identifiers might be instances or international exposure (like WB or other organizations). Who gets it and at what stage?
Posted in highly connected office like PMO or CMO.
Posted in some dept that oversees other departments (eg ?? perhaps FInance, etc).
At DM level, you can identify CS posted to bigger or better cities vs DM posted to smaller towns/districts.
CS getting opportunites as CEO of new agencies or some frontier aspirational project, etc.
To get more info: