Open 0xkubectl opened 3 months ago
Is there any particular reason behind changing the structure of the proposal? And I'm not sure where available_features
comes from. Is this code functional?
The code is functional, if you have a look here, you can see that available_features
is a configuration value. The idea being that this decorator can deal with more that one feature at a time. I.e. there are 3 Features of OpenAPI requried to accurately describe an Api. As some generators only support a different subset of those features, you can run redocly with different config values and produce specs that satisfy the feature constraints of a given generator.
If I understood you proposal correctly the decorator would only have supported one feature (either use the fallback or dont), which would limit the use of other operators like anyOf
or allOf
. On why I changed the exact syntax, I wanted it to be clear what is replaced and how. If all required features are present x-feature
will be rendered what is in the desired
object and otherwise whats in the fallback
object. Futhermore I believe this allows for more flexibility as instead of just one key, a whole object with multiple properties can be added or removed, based on features.
POC for https://github.com/vrchatapi/specification/issues/370
This is a draft and not done. Its more to see if the idea works and to gague how other contributers like the impl.
Things missing:
Not sure if there is the right place to put this plugin. Feedback is welcome :3