nx is slower than turbo (windows machine) July 16

[bryanltobing]

Not sure I read this correctly but this is my results by running npm run benchmark

I ran this twice and got similar results

The command ran in 13375ms
------------------------
results
------------------------
average lage time is: 13584.7
average turbo time is: 4748.2
average lerna (powered by nx) time is: 5246.8
average nx time is: 4893.4
nx is 2.776127028242122x faster than lage
nx is 0.9703273797359709x faster than turbo
nx is 1.0722197245269138x faster than lerna (powered by nx)

npx envinfo

System:
  OS: Windows 10 10.0.22000
  CPU: (16) x64 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H with Radeon Graphics
  Memory: 4.01 GB / 13.86 GB
Binaries:
  Node: 16.13.2 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\node.EXE
  Yarn: 1.22.19 - ~\AppData\Roaming\npm\yarn.CMD
  npm: 8.1.2 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\npm.CMD
Managers:
  Cargo: 1.61.0 - ~\.cargo\bin\cargo.EXE
Utilities:
  Git: 2.37.0. - /mingw64/bin/git
IDEs:
  VSCode: 1.69.1 - C:\Users\bryan\AppData\Local\Programs\Microsoft VS Code\bin\code.CMD
Languages:
  Bash: 4.4.23 - C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin\bash.EXE
  Perl: 5.34.0 - C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin\perl.EXE
  Rust: 1.61.0 - /c/Users/bryan/.cargo/bin/rustc
Browsers:
  Edge: Spartan (44.22000.120.0), Chromium (103.0.1264.62)
  Internet Explorer: 11.0.22000.120
Monorepos:
  Yarn Workspaces: 1.22.19
  Lerna: 5.1.0

[AgentEnder]

Hey @bryantobing12!

Your results definitely show that, I'm not sure what the reason would be for you. I just reran the benchmark on my windows PC. Lerna / Lage both had some issues with my setup, but here were the numbers for turbo and Nx:

average turbo time is: 10724.6
average nx time is: 3110.3
nx is 3.4480918239398126x faster than turbo

envinfo

System:
    OS: Windows 10 10.0.22000
    CPU: (8) x64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-9700K CPU @ 3.60GHz
    Memory: 14.87 GB / 31.92 GB
  Binaries:
    Node: 16.0.0 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\node.EXE
    Yarn: 1.19.0 - ~\AppData\Roaming\npm\yarn.CMD
    npm: 7.10.0 - C:\Program Files\nodejs\npm.CMD
  Managers:
    Cargo: 1.46.0 - ~\.cargo\bin\cargo.EXE
    pip2: 9.0.3 - C:\Python27\Scripts\pip2.EXE
  Utilities:
    CMake: 3.13.4
    Git: 2.36.1.
  Virtualization:
    Docker: 19.03.8 - C:\Program Files\Docker\Docker\resources\bin\docker.EXE
  IDEs:
    VSCode: 1.62.0 - C:\Users\craig\AppData\Local\Programs\Microsoft VS Code\bin\code.CMD
    Visual Studio: 15.9.28307.344 (Visual Studio Enterprise 2017), 16.8.30711.63 (Visual Studio Community 2019)
  Languages:
    Bash: 4.4.23 - C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin\bash.EXE
    Go: 1.15.3 - C:\Go\bin\go.EXE
    Perl: 5.34.0 - C:\Program Files\Git\usr\bin\perl.EXE
    Rust: 1.46.0
  Databases:
    SQLite: 3.22.0 - C:\Program Files (x86)\Android\android-sdk\platform-tools\sqlite3.EXE
  Browsers:
    Chrome: 103.0.5060.114
    Edge: Spartan (44.22000.120.0), Chromium (103.0.1264.44)
    Internet Explorer: 11.0.22000.120
  Monorepos:
    Yarn Workspaces: 1.19.0
    Lerna: 5.1.0

[lucascompython]

Running the benchmark I get similar results saying that NX is slower than Turbo and Lage. This is on Arch Linux btw, on the 13/06/2023.

The command ran in 672ms
------------------------
results
------------------------
average lage time is: 672.4
average turbo time is: 431.1
average nx time is: 713.4
nx is 0.9425287356321839x faster than lage
nx is 0.6042893187552566x faster than turbo

This shows that Turbo is 1.654 times faster than NX and 1.559 times faster than Lage.

envinfo

  System:
    OS: Linux 6.3 undefined
    CPU: (32) x64 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    Memory: 17.92 GB / 30.49 GB
    Container: Yes
    Shell: 5.9 - /usr/bin/zsh
  Binaries:
    Node: 20.3.0 - /usr/bin/node
    npm: 8.19.2 - /usr/bin/npm