Implement "use local parameters" option

[GoogleCodeExporter]

subj

Original issue reported on code.google.com by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 8:09

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Victor:

Hello Jannis!

I started work on "use local parameters" and now for me not everything is clear 
because we added material parameters to tables and charts. So I will describe a 
picture with data that we have and you will say me how to connect data to get 
correct 
result:

We have list of simulations (it can be only one(current) simulation or several 
simulations that checked in table of simulations). I will call this list 
"Global 
Simulations". Each simulation in this list have a next data:
1. Material Parameters values.
2. Material Parameters Inputs information.
3. Suspension calculation option. (rho_f/rho_s/rho_sus/C is calculated)
4. Simulation Parameters values
5. Simulation Parameters input information.
6. Filter simulation calculation option. (Standart, Design and so on)

We have also table with local input parameters. Each row of this table can 
correspond 
to next data:
1. Material Parameters values.  (DO WE NEED IT THERE?)
2. Material Parameters Inputs information.  (DO WE NEED IT THERE?)
3. Suspension calculation option.   (DO WE NEED IT THERE?)
4. Simulation Parameters values
5. Simulation Parameters input information.
6. Filter simulation calculation option. (Standart, Design and so on)

I think we need 3rd thing to allow selecting of any x-parameter.
If we need 1st thing than we need 2nd also. Bu if we use st thing than the 
whole 
conception of "use local input parameters" doesn't make sense! Why to reenter 
everything?

The program for each simulation and for each row from the table take data from 
simulation change some info to that info what in local inputs (table) and use 
this 
data to constructing curves. So I ask you to think what we need to have in this 
table 
(1st, 2nd and 3rd things) and say me what to implement.

Thank you, waiting for your response.

Bye.

Original comment by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 8:10

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Jannis:

Hello Victor,
The option “Use local parameters” checked has to be the same as we had it 
before. 
That means we shouldn’t allow variation of the material parameters and we 
shouldn’t 
allow variation of the calculation option.
Example: We have only one simulation in the Simulation list.
What we can do for the diagrams: We can choose any calculation option 
independent on 
the calculation option of the simulation AND we can plot more than one curve 
for each 
simulation BECAUSE we can change the input parameters (A, Dp, n/tc, hc, tf etc- 
depending on the selected calculation option!). BUT no possibility to change 
the 
material parameters. That means for this option we shouldn’t have material 
parameters 
as x-axis parameter but only the setting parameters (A, Dp, n/tc, tf, hc etc). 
That 
is exactly how we had it before. 

The meaning of this Option “Use local parameters” is ONLY to enable for 
each 
simulation MORE THAN ONE CURVE by changing the values of the input setting 
parameters 
of the simulation.
For example selecting the calculation Option 1 the Dp is Input. We can have 3 
different curves by changing for example only the Dp entering any values of Dp 
we 
want!

AGAIN: Please keep the same concept for this option as we had before.

We can speak via phone tomorrow if you want.

Have a good night,
Jannis

Original comment by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 8:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Jannis:

Hello Victor,
Regarding the option “Use local parameters” I wanted to do a correction to 
what I 
wrote you yesterday.
I think we should enable also for this option (and similar to the option “Use 
local 
parameters=unchecked”) the possibility to have different calculation options. 
 Of 
course like the option Use local parameters=unchecked we should have checkboxes 
to 
enable the special case that all simulations for the diagrams  have the same 
calculation option as the current row OR  another checkbox that will enable 
that 
every row has the calculation option of her “mother” – simulation (that 
is the 
corresponding simulation in the simulation table!).
I hope I didn’t confuse you BUT I see that as the Best solution:

Again: For  the option  Use local parameters=checked we don’t use the 
material 
parameters as x-axis parameters (the material parameters only for the option 
Use 
local parameters=unchecked).
-          For both options (Use local parameters=checked AND Use local 
parameters=unchecked) we should allow different calculation options!!!

-          For both options (Use local parameters=checked AND Use local 
parameters=unchecked)  we should allow 2 checkboxes:

-Use for all the same calculation option as the current simulation

-use the calculation option of the “mother” simulation=the simulation in 
the 
simulations table=big table

Please write me back if something is not clear.

Tomorrow I am travelling to the Philippines.
I will have access to my Emails on Sunday.

Best Regards,
Jannis

Original comment by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 8:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 9:07

• Added labels: Type-Enhancement
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by victorbarinov on 19 Apr 2010 at 9:07

• Changed state: New

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Implemented need to be checked.

Original comment by victorbarinov on 5 May 2010 at 8:31

• Changed state: Started