Open vschroeter opened 1 month ago
A global settings option to link to headers and a per note option by adding tags like linker-include-headers
and linker-exclude-headers
is a good idea.
However, there are ways in which it can go wrong, so I would suggest other more granular options to have as well.
For example, if two different files have the same named headings or if a heading is in a concise form that only makes sense to use in a specific note. Take these two notes for example:
Skin cancer.md
# Etiology
Ultraviolet radiation.
Lung cancer.md
# Etiology
Chronic smoking.
For the above examples, Etiology
by itself is ambiguous, as it can refer to Etiology of skin cancer
or Etiology of lung cancer
. You would only know which it's referring to if you're in those notes, but not if you're virtually linking to Etiology
from another note.
Because of this, it's really Etiology of skin cancer
/Skin cancer etiology
or Etiology of lung cancer
/Lung cancer etiology
that I would want virtual links for, not Etiology
by itself, even though in the notes themselves it makes perfect sense to just write Etiology
. This also presents the need for aliases for each header.
The solution for this can be to allow the user to add a little bit of commented text below each header that would allow for:
#linker-include-header
and #linker-exclude-header
tags)#linker-include-header/aliases-only
tag)For the above examples, this is how it may look:
Skin cancer.md
# Etiology of skin cancer
%% #linker-include-header
Skin cancer etiology | Skin cancer etiologies
%%
Ultraviolet radiation.
Lung cancer.md
# Etiology
%% #linker-include-header/aliases-only
Etiology of Lung cancer | Etiologies of lung cancer | Lung cancer etiology | Lung cancer etiologies %%
Chronic smoking.
All in all, I believe this would be a good approach to this idea, but I don't know if the implementation would be straightforward. Another cool thing this would allow is a note that acts as a glossary of definitions, not requiring a person to make a note for each term in the glossary:
Glossary.md
# Heart attack
%%
Heart attacks | MI | Myocardial infarction
%%
A medical condition characterized by lack of blood flow to a region of the heart.
# Cancer
%%
Cancers | Malignancy | Malignancies
%%
An abnormal, uncontrollable growth of cells.
Interestingly, this would provide similar functionality to the Note Definitions plugin, but in a different manner that's more flexible since the virtual linking in this plugin is faster and less constrained.
Thanks, and looking forward to hear your thoughts :)
I want this feature I've also been creating aliases for the subheadings in the file, if I really want obsidian to set the method to make the subheadings a topic directly at the subheadings
What do you guys think about adding virtual links for headings in notes?
I sometimes have the case where I have a higher-level note that explains several sub-concepts, each with its own subheader, under the same main concept. But I still want these subheadings to be automatically linked without having to define aliases for each of them.
Maybe this could be an option, globally in the settings and per note by adding a tag?