Closed allenhaozhu closed 2 years ago
Hey, The numbers that we provide for cifar are from the online evaluation. In our experiments, these are usually a little higher than what you would get with the standard offline evaluation. Probably if you train for longer or tune the parameters, you will get the same performance.
I'm closing this, if you need anything else feel free to re-open.
I did an evaluation on the barlow-twin model (ResNet18 on CIFAR ) provided by your checkpoint. The result is 91.56 acc@1. So is there anything wrong? I used
python3 ../../main_linear.py --dataset cifar10 --backbone resnet18 --data_dir ./ --max_epochs 100 --gpus 0 --sync_batchnorm --precision 16 --optimizer sgd --scheduler step --lr 0.1 --lr_decay_steps 60 80 --weight_decay 0 --batch_size 128 --num_workers 4 --name general-linear-eval --pretrained_feature_extractor cifar/trained_models/barlow_twins/barlow-cifar10-otu5cw89-ep\=999.ckpt --project self-supervised --wandb