Support centering members in VPTeamPage

[stevending1st]

Describe the bug

Starting from version 1.0.0-rc.43, if there is only one member, the VPTeamMembers component will not be centered by default.

Reproduction

---
layout: home
---

<script setup>
import { withBase } from 'vitepress'
import {
  VPTeamPage,
  VPTeamPageTitle,
  VPTeamMembers,
  VPTeamPageSection
} from 'vitepress/theme'

const convener = [
    {
    avatar: withBase('./avatar.png'),
    name: 'Bob',
  },

]
</script>

<VPTeamPage>
  <VPTeamPageSection v-if="convener">
    <template #title>WHo</template>
    <template #members>
      <VPTeamMembers size="small" :members="convener" />
    </template>
  </VPTeamPageSection>
</VPTeamPage>

Expected behavior

System Info

System:
    OS: Windows 11
  Binaries:
    Node: 20.10.0
    Yarn: 1.22.19
    npm: 10.5.0
    pnpm: 8.15.5
  Browsers:
    Edge: Chromium (123.0.2420.81)
    Internet Explorer: 11.0.22621.1
  npmPackages:
    vitepress: 1.0.0-rc.43

Additional context

No response

Validations

• [X] Check if you're on the latest VitePress version.
• [X] Follow our Code of Conduct
• [X] Read the docs.
• [X] Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.

[brc-dd]

I don't think it's ever centered, regardless of count of members.

[stevending1st]

I don't think it's ever centered, regardless of count of members.

Thank you for your reply, but this seems not to provide a configurable parameter for centering, and I believe it is a breaking change.

[brc-dd]

I believe it is a breaking change

It never provided any prop to adjust centering, nor it was ever centered. How is this a breaking change? It's a feature request at best. Moreover it uses grid and centering a row in grid is not possible. We would need to rewrite it using flex.

[stevending1st]

It never provided any prop to adjust centering, nor it was ever centered. How is this a breaking change? It's a feature request at best. Moreover it uses grid and centering a row in grid is not possible. We would need to rewrite it using flex.

Thank you again for your reply, and I now agree with what you said.