Open dsl101 opened 4 years ago
https://packagecontrol.io/packages/JavaScriptNext%20-%20ES6%20Syntax is not maintained for 2 years now. Official syntax by now has implemented probably all and more of what JavaScriptNext supports. It's not a good idea to keep using it. Even if you think that highlighting is better in it ("better" being subjective as official highlighting might make more sense consistency wise).
Have you tried disabling the default javascript package?
Ctrl+Shift+P -> Disable Package -> JavaScript
OK, several separate thoughts:
In fact, I've removed JSNext and re-enabled the built-in JavaScript syntax, and I notice several differences between the scopes from a .vue
file and a .js
file. Small example in a plain .js
file:
The components
key scope is:
source.js
meta.export.js
meta.object-literal.js
meta.object-literal.key.js
but in a .vue
file:
with:
text.html.vue
source.js.embedded.html
source.js
meta.export.js
meta.mapping.js
meta.mapping.key.js
string.unquoted.js
Doesn't seem like that is the same syntax highlighter being used for the JS part...
I have a similar issue. Interestingly the syntax highlight is correct, if I set lang=ts
. Which I am not interested in doing for this component though.
The documentation suggests the
<script>
block will use whatever syntax is used for regular.js
files, but I'm getting very different results in Vue SFC<script>
vs plain.js
files. My default syntax is JavaScript Next, and looks like this (correct):but that code in a Vue SFC looks like this (many things miscoloured):
There are lots of other differences too, and I can get the effect in plain
.js
files by switching to the built-in Javascript syntax (which is the reason I moved to JS Next). So, is there a way to be explicit about which syntax to use, or is there just a bug not picking up the configured.js
syntax setting?