Is there any solution for quick low-/no-overhead databinding to something like a store object? Implemented? Library suicide pact?
All this boilerplate code just to set up two-way data binding is abomination.Maybe it's too late already, looking at popularity graphs. Anyone that watches a tutorial on databinding with vuex will surely have puked and ran away. It's a shame.
If there is no better concept, just create all these mindless getter setter and mutator methods IMPLICITLY unless definedI. I perhaps fail to understand how that is not better in any case (if properly communicated that this happens).
I think C# does something similar:
C# property sample:
public int Age { get; set; }
Is the same as:
private int age;public int Age{public get { return this.age; }public set { this.age = value; }}
Btw, if you want read only, in C# you can make the setter private for example:
public string Age { get; private set; }
Works since 2012 or so. But what do they know about creating a popular language.
What does the proposed API look like?
Simply generate the default boilerplate getter setters and mutations (on build), if the user doesn't define any.
What problem does this feature solve?
Is there any solution for quick low-/no-overhead databinding to something like a store object? Implemented? Library suicide pact?
All this boilerplate code just to set up two-way data binding is abomination.Maybe it's too late already, looking at popularity graphs. Anyone that watches a tutorial on databinding with vuex will surely have puked and ran away. It's a shame.
If there is no better concept, just create all these mindless getter setter and mutator methods IMPLICITLY unless definedI. I perhaps fail to understand how that is not better in any case (if properly communicated that this happens).
I think C# does something similar:
C# property sample:
public int Age { get; set; }Is the same as:
private int age;public int Age{public get { return this.age; }public set { this.age = value; }}Btw, if you want read only, in C# you can make the setter private for example:
public string Age { get; private set; }Works since 2012 or so. But what do they know about creating a popular language.
What does the proposed API look like?
Simply generate the default boilerplate getter setters and mutations (on build), if the user doesn't define any.