Closed Jairwin-L closed 6 months ago
Why do you think expanding the link could be bad? At least it gives reference for what the link is pointing.
You could definitely disable this via css.
A scenario I have encountered at present is that if you make a resume, after printing it out, the redundant links displayed will make the entire page take up a lot of space; at the same time, the readability is not high.
If a page is a good printable one, anyone should not expect to see lots of external links in it. For example, a normal blog post should mainly contain plain text and links to other articles in current site, instead of adding lots of references in lines.
Besides, we are only printing external links, which is not attachable even if you print all pages, so we think that it's better to declare their address. Printing links pointing to current site is a bad idea, I agree with that.
You can easily hide your website links with CSS:
a {
@media print {
&[href^="http://"],
&[href^="https://"]
{
&::after {
content: ''!important;
}
}
}
}
Do you still need any further discussion?
Of course, what you are talking about is also from one aspect, and I should be able to understand it. My main points here are: there are external links because they can be accessed online, and they are printable so that readers can directly print the original content. Even if there are links, they are displayed in text form. As you said, it can be solved through CSS. I also agree with this. Because I saw that v2 is different from v1, I suddenly wanted to know more about this aspect. Of course, there may be a blind spot in my knowledge in this aspect.
This issue is marked as stale
because it has not had recent activity. Issues marked with stale
will be closed if they have no activity within 7 days.
Description
the print preview effects of the two versions are different. the v2 version should be the same as v1, right? v2.x. v1.x.