Closed DanielSchiavini closed 5 months ago
yes, this looks nice. can we add a test for the case where both the caller and child lines have a dev reason? (the behavior in the code looks right -- the child should not stomp the parent reason -- but it will be good to have a test for it)
What I did
Fixed https://github.com/vyperlang/titanoboa/issues/199
How I did it
Copying dev reason to the parent error details
How to verify it
Test is included
Description for the changelog
dev reason is now propagated from child contracts so it may be used with
boa.reverts
Cute Animal Picture