Closed charles-cooper closed 4 months ago
The evaluations on the Venom-scape need to raise static compilation error on out of bounds, etc. I think the solution should be in the form of #4013 (sorry I thought I had those commits pushed :( )
Of course the tests need to start accommodating for the compiler to detect those errors at compile time.
What do you think?
The evaluations on the Venom-scape need to raise static compilation error on out of bounds, etc. I think the solution should be in the form of #4013 (sorry I thought I had those commits pushed :( )
Of course the tests need to start accommodating for the compiler to detect those errors at compile time.
What do you think?
i mean in that case we should be consistent across all the eval functions. but anyway i don't think they necessarily indicate an error, it's totally valid to end up with a -2
as argument to shr
for example (and i think it can be generated from the frontend, like if you bitcast a literal -2: int256
to a uint256
).
some sccp operations were not wrapped in
wrap_*op
, so they could panic on input which is out of range. this commit wraps all the remaining sccp evaluators for well-formedness.What I did
How I did it
How to verify it
Commit message
Commit message for the final, squashed PR. (Optional, but reviewers will appreciate it! Please see our commit message style guide for what we would ideally like to see in a commit message.)
Description for the changelog
Cute Animal Picture
![Put a link to a cute animal picture inside the parenthesis-->]()