Thanks for the codes! I would like to implement your evaluation protocol for KITTI-360 experiments. According to your paper, the test set comprises 30,758 frames from the first two sequences.
We split the dataset into two parts, where the first two sequences (30,758 frames) are the testing set, and the rest are used for training and cross-validation.
And in this repository a dataset class parses 0000_sync and 0001_sync filenames.
However, since KITTI-360 did not release 0001_sync, the dataset class just parses 0000_sync (11,518 frames).
I think the number 30,758 may be from the actual serial sequences 0000_sync (11,518) and 0002_sync (19,240).
Which is correct for evaluation, 11,518 or 30,758 frames?
Thanks for the codes! I would like to implement your evaluation protocol for KITTI-360 experiments. According to your paper, the test set comprises 30,758 frames from the first two sequences.
And in this repository a dataset class parses
0000_syncand0001_syncfilenames.https://github.com/vzyrianov/lidargen/blob/4c3226cd7a53c241320923f936a434fdda3bad59/LiDARGen/datasets/kitti.py#L17-L20
However, since KITTI-360 did not release
0001_sync, the dataset class just parses0000_sync(11,518 frames). I think the number 30,758 may be from the actual serial sequences0000_sync(11,518) and0002_sync(19,240). Which is correct for evaluation, 11,518 or 30,758 frames?