Finish documenting CCG process - Githubissues

w3c-ccg / community

COMMUNITY: W3C Credentials Community Group Community Repo

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/community

Other

41 stars 6 forks source link

Finish documenting CCG process #138

Closed kimdhamilton closed 3 years ago

kimdhamilton commented 4 years ago

For example, we want to revise requirements for community notes being completed. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vj811aUbs8GwZUNo-LIFBHafsz4rZTSnRtPv7RQaqNc/edit#

kimdhamilton commented 4 years ago

kimdhamilton commented 4 years ago

TODO: consider revising work item process:

human friendly description
encourage discussion at a higher level

kimdhamilton commented 3 years ago

Latest Status (consolidated)

[X] Include additional guidance from 7/8 comment
- Cleaned up "create spec" documentation see here
[X] Create a template repo and update docs
- See template repo
[x] Improve new work item guidance as above
- [x] human friendly description
- [x] encourage discussion at a higher level
[x] convert entire doc to spectext

kimdhamilton commented 3 years ago

Draft here: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/workitem-process/

Propose considering this an ongoing community draft and a working document.

vsnt commented 3 years ago

Request to add two additional CCG specific requirements (item 2.1.2)

Non-jargon communication.
- Answer the Heilmeier Questions: https://www.darpa.mil/work-with-us/heilmeier-catechism
- What are you trying to do? Articulate your objectives using absolutely no jargon.
- How is it done today, and what are the limits of current practice?
- What is new in your approach and why do you think it will be successful?
- Who cares? If you are successful, what difference will it make?
- What are the risks?
- How much will it cost?
- How long will it take?
- What are the mid-term and final “exams” to check for success?
- Identify the primary audience for the work item & how will they use it?
Diversity and inclusion.
- How are you involving participants from multiple skill sets in this work item? (technical, design, product, marketing, anthropological, UX)
- How are you involving participants from various global locations in this work item? (Americas, Euro, Asia-Pacific, South America)
- How do you plan to involve non-technical subject matter experts & end users of your work item? How will you work item improve their lives?
- What actions are you taking to make this work item accessible to a non-technical audience?

vsnt commented 3 years ago

Work item participant resources: in order to increase the diversity of work item participants, the CCG will identify & recommend a pool of participants that work item owners can involve in their work items.

Identify CCG participants that would like to be asked to join new work items & their area of expertise, skill set, etc. (How they want to volunteer)

vsnt commented 3 years ago

Peer Leadership Like peer programming, peer leadership is a leadership planning technique to expose new participant to leadership opportunities without requiring them to take the item on their own. Request to add this as a CCG work item requirement.

For new work items, the leads should identify someone who has not worked on work items, but would like to, to work on the work item as a mentee/pair work item leader in order to gain experience and confidence.

vsnt commented 3 years ago

Propose to close this item, as I have split off three comments that added scope creep to this issue to be tracked on their own.

vsnt commented 3 years ago

Propose to close this item. @kimdhamilton - any objections? If none, we will close on Dec 28, 2020.

kimdhamilton commented 3 years ago

this is perfect; I'll close it now