Closed vsnt closed 3 years ago
fyi @wyc @brentzundel
Depends on #180
@wyc and myself will organize a meeting for the VCWG once there is a set of PRs that the editors feel should be added to the VC spec. As far as organizing CCG meetings for the VC maintenance work to work on those PRs, that would best be done by the VC spec editors. As far as I'm aware, that list currently consists of @msporny.
As far as I'm aware, that list currently consists of @msporny.
I expect that we won't be able to do this until the DID Core specification is in Candidate Recommendation phase... and we're clear of the VC HTTP API work that's being done right now. Unfortunately, end of March at the earliest. We could have a meeting to triage, but the group of people doing stuff on VCs/DIDs/etc. are currently engaged w/ higher priority items.
Also, need a supporting Editor for the VC spec -- we should spend some time finding someone (that will actively do work -- not just someone that wants their name on a spec). We might want to bring this up on a future CCG call.
Next steps could be:
I hope the VCWG can also address PRs on the VC Test Suite: https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite/pulls
Edit: Some PRs were merged; thanks @msporny.
4/20/21: Have PR coming soon.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/774 <- PR being reviewed. Will share with list shortly.
@wyc has scheduled this, so closing this item.
Address the results of the conversation from #170