Closed bumblefudge closed 2 years ago
@mprorock should probably be tagged for review instead of kim!
I'd like to discuss this item on the 7/27 call.
Began discussion on 7/27, needed more time, so chairs will schedule for a future meeting agenda.
I have added this work item to the 9/21 CCG call agenda to review+discuss with the community. Would the owners please attend this meeting. Thank you. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Sep/0074.html
Discussed on the call that CCG is leaning towards not working on DID methods in CCG that rely on one-vendor or one-community VDRs (particularly single public blockchains with substantial financial resources for blockchain development).
If the CCG decides not to accept the work item, the co-sponsors (Spruce Systems, NYC, and Gravity.Earth, Paris/Nairobi) will continue to work outside of CCG and interested parties are encouraged to email them if interested in participating. Interested parties can also reach out in the meantime if the process takes a few weeks either way.
Per discussion at the 9/21 CCG call, this work item has entered the 7 day review period. If anyone has concerns about this becoming a work item, it should be raised prior to EOD Sept 29, 2021. If no concerns are raised, this will move to a work item at that time.
@wyc what is Francois' github?
Repo is here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-tz Please add Francois github, as I do not have it.
It appears likely that @frague59 is the correct Francois Guerin's Github handle. Hopefully this tag will get confirmation or denial. :-)
I think we could switch the tag to @GravityID , as I'm not sure Francois is still the right person at https://gravity.earth . His old github handle was specifically for his Gravity.earth work.
All, I tried adding @GravityID, but it didn't accept into the repo settings. Would the work item owners please take this and address it here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-tz/issues/1/
Thanks, I am closing this issue.
Even if my name has been cited, I'm not the right guy, sorry...
Hello. I did not receive any invit on my side.
Le jeu. 13 janv. 2022 à 18:02, vsnt @.***> a écrit :
All, I tried adding @GravityID https://github.com/GravityID, but it didn't accept into the repo settings. Would the work item owners please take this and address it here: w3c-ccg/did-tz#1 https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-tz/issues/1
Thanks, I am closing this issue.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/202#issuecomment-1012329479, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARWCDCXKRSBXL254OWPJJ7LUV4ATLANCNFSM5AP7AUYQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hello Gravity, what's your github id, or can you login to github (click the link "view it on GitHub) and reply directly with it directly in the thread. Thanks!
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 11:01 AM Gravity @.***> wrote:
Hello. I did not receive any invit on my side.
Le jeu. 13 janv. 2022 à 18:02, vsnt @.***> a écrit :
All, I tried adding @GravityID https://github.com/GravityID, but it didn't accept into the repo settings. Would the work item owners please take this and address it here: w3c-ccg/did-tz#1 https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-tz/issues/1
Thanks, I am closing this issue.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/202#issuecomment-1012329479 , or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARWCDCXKRSBXL254OWPJJ7LUV4ATLANCNFSM5AP7AUYQ
. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS < https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/202#issuecomment-1012421820, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBNKK3VY2HJVXZTMPNHY73UV4OP3ANCNFSM5AP7AUYQ . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: @.***>
-- Heather Vescent http://www.heathervescent.com/ President, The Purple Tornado, Inc https://thepurpletornado.com/ ~ The Future in Present Tense ~ Co-Chair, Credentials Community Group @W3C https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/ Author, The Secret of Spies https://amzn.to/2GfJpXH Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual https://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Attack-Survival-Manual-Apocalypse/dp/1681886545/ Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity https://ssiscoop.com/
@heathervescent https://twitter.com/heathervescent | Film Futures https://vimeo.com/heathervescent | Medium @.***/> | LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/ | Future of Security Updates https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/
My github id is 74195338
New Work Item Proposal
We would like to open up the design process for did:tz to a more open and consultative/deliberative conversation in the open.
Include Link to Abstract or Draft
Draft spec here (ReSpec)
List Owners
Wayne Chang, Spruce, @wyc Johannes Ebert, Gravity.earth, @GravityID
Work Item Questions
Explain what you are trying to do using no jargon or acronyms.
We would like to open up the design process for did:tz to a more open and consultative/deliberative conversation in the open to better serve the Tezos community.
did:tz is a multi-modal DID method design with many offchain, on-chain, and side-chain/L2 use cases in mind. A valid Tezos address (controlled by a private key from any of 3 supported curves) can control an "implicit" DID document (generatively created from the address like a did:key), an "onchain" DID document (published via smart contract on any Tezos ledger), or have "patches" applied to it that are published and governed by a closed network or authority (including, for example, a sidetree network). In particular, this third option has not been specified in any detail, and we would be particularly curious to hear from implementers of such systems before further specifying it.
There are already users of the first two kinds of did:tz mentioned above, and work has begun on at least one system that would utilize the third. For this reason, design and specification are timely.
We think that a method that specifies the three "layers" of resolution in common and outlines upgrade paths for moving from the simpler to the more complex forms of DID without rotation or additional set-up will, in time, simplify and strengthen the options available to relying systems.
We are hoping that by opening up our DID method design process to be more open, we will hear from business and technical voices far and wide, particularly since the Tezos ecosystem is fairly international and open-source in nature. If many weeks pass without input, we may do active outreach via the Tezos community and DIF.
We have tried to craft a did method specification draft that is accessible and welcome PRs if it can be made more accessible.