search

w3c-ccg / community

COMMUNITY: W3C Credentials Community Group Community Repo
https://w3c-ccg.github.io/community
Other
41 stars 6 forks source link

Add a DID web method as a work item #65

Closed dmitrizagidulin closed 5 years ago

dmitrizagidulin commented 5 years ago

New Work Item Proposal

See W3C-CCG New Work Item Process

Include Link to Abstract or Draft

The current draft for the web-based DID method is here (and the point of this Work Item is to move it to a repo under the CCG github org):

https://github.com/uport-project/specs/blob/develop/did-methods/https-did-method.md

Things to note:

List Owners

Identify 1 lead (person responsible for advancing the work item) and at least 1 other owner. Ideally, include their github usernames:

peacekeeper commented 5 years ago

@dlongley

but it's more important that we find a way to articulate those intuitive requirements than us assuming did:web can't possibly meet them.

Absolutely, +1 to articulating requirements in a generic way that would then apply to all proposed methods equally.

nadalin commented 5 years ago

@peacekeeper You can't add technically non-enforceable desires in the specification.

brentzundel commented 5 years ago

But you can add a rubric of principles and normatively require that did method specifications rate their level of conformance to those principles.

nadalin commented 5 years ago

@brentzundel Not in a W3C Specification as that is out of scope, if you wanted to do something outside this specification for some kind of trust mark you can do that

brentzundel commented 5 years ago

@nadalin why would that be out of scope for a W3C Specification?

nadalin commented 5 years ago

@brentzundel First of all what you have proposed is not testable, you are asking for a subjective conformance results, it can't be tested as part of the implementation conformance unless you have specific testable requirements listed in the specification and since this a data model I have no idea how you achieve that.

ChristopherA commented 5 years ago

@dmitrizagidulin & @awoie — Can you update us as to this status of your work item proposal for this— who all are engaged in it besides yourselves to continue work? Any new documents, roadmap or other timelines?

The chairs believe that sufficient conversation about this work item has occurred, and as we don't require consensus for work item creation, there are no obstacles to supporting you beginning this work given that there are two parties committed to. We just want to make sure you are still interested.

dmitrizagidulin commented 5 years ago

@ChristopherA - I am still very much interested in working on this work item (and I believe @awoie and @rhiaro are as well). Plus there was some interest in this from the Solid camp, as well.

So the next step would be - can the CCG repo be created?

ChristopherA commented 5 years ago

Repo created, @dmitrizagidulin is initial owner. Add at will!

Closed.

TallTed commented 5 years ago

It's good to link to things...

The new repo: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-method-web

awoie commented 5 years ago

Sorry for the late reply. Yes, I'm still interested in working on this project.

Oliver

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:21 PM Ted Thibodeau Jr notifications@github.com wrote:

It's good to link to things...

The new repo: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-method-web

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/65?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKLN3MDCU5VHBQZBOJHE7O3QADNGFA5CNFSM4HGDRG72YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2J2J2I#issuecomment-512992489, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKLN3MD324NCDAQJPIUFKNLQADNGFANCNFSM4HGDRG7Q .