search

w3c-ccg / did-spec

Please see README.md for latest version being developed by W3C DID WG.
https://w3c.github.io/did-core/
Other
124 stars 45 forks source link

Cleanup terms around "DID scheme" #185

Closed rhiaro closed 5 years ago

rhiaro commented 5 years ago

Use "DID URI scheme" and "DID method scheme" instead of "generic" and "specific" DID scheme, re: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/issues/127#issuecomment-469200045

Preview | Diff

tplooker commented 5 years ago

@talltree great doc, with the 'service-type' and 'key-type' generic did parameter names should the description state, selects a list of services/publicKeys from the did doc?

talltree commented 5 years ago

@tplooker Yes, that was the conclusion on today's DID spec call. @peacekeeper has the action item to suggest new text for those two parameter descriptions. I'm sure he'd welcome suggestions from you on that.

rhiaro commented 5 years ago

I think this PR is now superseded by https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-spec/pull/187/

peacekeeper commented 5 years ago

I think this PR is now superseded by #187

@rhiaro I think that's partially true, but I feel this PR here still has some good thoughts and content around the "DID scheme" terminology that the other PR doesn't fully address yet. We should probably collaborate to reconcile the two PRs.

msporny commented 5 years ago

The DID TF moved to close this on the 2019-08-01 call, in preference of merging PR #189.