Closed AxelNennker closed 5 years ago
Linked Data Proofs, Linked Data Signatures, and the DID Spec specify "cryptographic suites". For example, these are all cryptographic suites mentioned by the current DID Spec:
Ed25519SignatureAuthentication2018, RsaSignatureAuthentication2018, Ed25519SignatureCapabilityAuthorization2018, etc.
The DID spec doesn't specify things at the RFC7518 level... but the cryptographic suites do, and yes, they should reference RFC7518 when possible.
This issue will be resolved by submitting a PR that adds a section titled "Relationship to JOSE", which should elaborate on these relationships.
Closing as we have adopted this issue in the new DIDWG repo.
Why not reference RFC7518 to specify cryptographic algorithms?
I think the did-spec should reference rfc7518 whenever cryptographic algorithm names need to be specified.