w3c-ccg did-spec issues

w3c-ccg / did-spec

Please see README.md for latest version being developed by W3C DID WG.

https://w3c.github.io/did-core/

Other

124 stars 45 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Resolutions from RWoT face to face

#26 cwebber closed 6 years ago
1
Should/can we drop the owner property on embedded keys?

#25 cwebber closed 6 years ago
1
JSON object @context first line requirement

#24 AxelNennker closed 6 years ago
5
Clarify DIDs help manage identifiers, not identities

#23 jandrieu closed 6 years ago
9
Simplify spec by moving to capabilities, proofs, and authn and authz

#22 msporny closed 7 years ago
7
2017-09 DID Spec Bug Triage

#21 msporny closed 6 years ago
1
Issues Link in Draft Spec

#20 ChristopherA closed 6 years ago
1
Update github link

#19 kimdhamilton closed 6 years ago
2
"id=?" in verifiable claims

#18 kimdhamilton closed 6 years ago
2
Proposal: Define DDO as "DID Descriptor Object" that can bootstrap into EDO "Entity Descriptor Object"

#17 ChristopherA closed 5 years ago
4
Language: At end of day DID+DDO+VRFC becomes "entity profile"

#16 ChristopherA closed 6 years ago
2
Insight for DID spec: proofs, not keys

#15 kimdhamilton closed 6 years ago
9
DID Method `did:example` should be reserved

#14 msporny closed 6 years ago
1
Need new class of keys because of overloaded Owner Keys

#13 kimdhamilton closed 6 years ago
9
DDO as composite object

#12 kimdhamilton closed 6 years ago
5
Do we need to adopt a capabilities-based delegation model?

#11 msporny closed 6 years ago
12
Should keys describe what they are used for?

#10 msporny closed 6 years ago
6
Create JSON-LD context for DID spec

#9 msporny closed 6 years ago
6
Is the `guardian` field duplicating functionality provided by the `control` field?

#8 msporny closed 6 years ago
2
`service` should not exist, rather a set of services

#7 msporny closed 6 years ago
1
`control` should not include boolean logic

#6 msporny closed 6 years ago
1
The Ed25519 key description needs to be cleared up

#5 msporny closed 6 years ago
8
Change `owner` to `publicKey`

#4 msporny closed 6 years ago
2
Formatting of 5.1 did scheme ABNF is broken

#3 alanz closed 7 years ago
1
I think I was also one of the authors?

#2 peacekeeper closed 7 years ago
0
Fix people info.

#1 davidlehn closed 7 years ago
0