I'm not sure if the intention is to add that term to the JSON-LD context, but both publicKeyJwk and EcdsaSecp256k1VerificationKey2019 are missing today.
People are using this in the field in exactly the manner used here, which fails to resolve the string to a fully qualified URI since it is not found in the listed context. As such, it is a potentially ambiguous term.
We should either update the context at w3id.org/security or define the term inline something like this:
I'm not sure if the intention is to add that term to the JSON-LD context, but both publicKeyJwk and EcdsaSecp256k1VerificationKey2019 are missing today.
Here in example 2 (just because it is shorter) https://w3c-ccg.github.io/lds-ecdsa-secp256k1-2019/#example-2
People are using this in the field in exactly the manner used here, which fails to resolve the string to a fully qualified URI since it is not found in the listed context. As such, it is a potentially ambiguous term.
We should either update the context at w3id.org/security or define the term inline something like this: