Open kimdhamilton opened 4 years ago
I've identified two problems we're trying to address. Given that there are two different problems, we may want to split this issue after elaboration.
Methods to connect a VC to its visual representation in a tamper-evident way are discussed elsewhere (e.g. "Verifiable Displays")
But that largely focuses on problem 1 above. It is worth exploring the conceptual match we are getting at with problem 1 -- are we talking about a more general category of verification instructions? I.e.
In general, issuers want control over the visual representation and there's no strong reason (at the moment) to constrain choices among the methods discussed above.
At the same time, to support interoperability among tools and apps, we may prefer some standardization of certain image (or other) related metadata, e.g. preview images, issuer logos, whether generally, per-domain, etc.
Other relevant considerations:
Regarding problem 2, some relevant patterns include:
Some of these concerns are general and some are specific to EDU. This needs to be broken down.
Related to #16 Credential Display Logic
Image/display discoverability and generalization
(Source: Anthony Camilleri) We might consider adding a 'displayproperties' field into the credential. This could include html defining the look and feel of the credential, allowing export to pdf/xml/image/openbadge or any other format we need printing. Several countries define the visual look of credentials by law, so this would give us full coverage of both systems. This would allow for a pdf VC wrapper to be generated from the VC itself.