Closed npm1 closed 1 year ago
This doesn't actually make much difference functionally- The list can still be empty. It does remove one of two empty list cases, so I don't mind the change.
Why is this needed?
I'm wondering how it relates to Adam's PR5 and if it makes it easier/harder.
It is not strictly "needed" but it makes the IDL reflect the semantics better and could provide a slightly better error message (from bindings code) if JS code does not provide a providers property.
Adam's proposal is unaffected as written.
What Christian said :)
Ping
LGTM
@bvandersloot-mozilla WDYT
Preview | Diff