Closed tidoust closed 11 months ago
Thanks for the change! But in the Preview I do not see these being linked, any idea why?
Hmm, I don't really know. The update to Bikeshed data that brought the new fragment identifiers was ~30mn ago. Could it be that the new data has not yet propagated to PR Preview?
More precisely, I think PR preview uses the online version of Bikeshed which does not yet seem to have the latest data. I guess I was too fast for once ;)
I think that the spec-prod action fetches the latest version of Bikeshed and of Bikeshed data, but I haven't checked, so you may want to wait a bit before you merge the PR.
Could you resolve merge conflicts and then we can merge this?
We rolled back on the change introduced in #452 and now use the more readable
httpwg.org
version of RFC9110 to populate the cross-references database. We also updated Specref to return thehttpwg.org
URL for that spec.This means that the cross-references database no longer has the section IDs and rather has the field name. This update rolls back the changes in #452 accordingly.
Preview | Diff