Closed obfuscoder closed 6 months ago
lgtm but could you resolve the IPR issue as described in https://labs.w3.org/repo-manager/pr/id/fedidcg/FedCM/583 ?
LGTM++
Yea ideally you can fix the affiliation. But I'm also open to consider this a non-substantive change since it just removes a note
As this PR is just about removing content, you could probably waive this requirement for this one. I'll try to get this IPR sorted out with my company, but it willl probably take a while.
SGTM.
Waving as non-substantive.
Preview | Diff