According to the comment by @pchampin on another issue followed by the comment of @maximelefrancois86 regarding the ISWJ paper of BOT, the definition of bot:containsZone and bot:containsElement should be updated, to indicate that this relation is only valid when the zone or resp. element is entirely contained in the other zone.
I would propose to add the following line to the rdfs:comment of bot:containsZone:
The relation bot:containsZone is only valid between two spatial building zones if the smallest zone is entirely contained in the other zone.
I would propose to add the following line to the rdfs:comment of bot:containsElement:
The relation bot:containsElement is only valid between a spatial building zone and a building element if the element is entirely contained in the zone.
According to the comment by @pchampin on another issue followed by the comment of @maximelefrancois86 regarding the ISWJ paper of BOT, the definition of
bot:containsZoneandbot:containsElementshould be updated, to indicate that this relation is only valid when the zone or resp. element is entirely contained in the other zone.I would propose to add the following line to the rdfs:comment of
bot:containsZone:I would propose to add the following line to the rdfs:comment of
bot:containsElement: