Best pratices regarding the application of BOT terminology can be described in SHACL (potentially using sh:severity equal to sh:Warning instead of the default sh:Violation).
Since OWL disjointness in the ontology is lifted as a result of the discussion under issue https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/bot/issues/24 , SHACL shapes can be used to indicate that the application of the following combination of properties between two nodes is probably a modeling error:
Best pratices regarding the application of BOT terminology can be described in SHACL (potentially using
sh:severityequal tosh:Warninginstead of the defaultsh:Violation).Such SHACL shapes can be based on the results of the modeling examples resulting from issue https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/bot/issues/76
Since OWL disjointness in the ontology is lifted as a result of the discussion under issue https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/bot/issues/24 , SHACL shapes can be used to indicate that the application of the following combination of properties between two nodes is probably a modeling error:
bot:containsZoneandbot:intersectsZonebot:containsElementandbot:intersectingElement