Closed GeorgFerdinandSchneider closed 7 years ago
As it is now we don't have properties in prod/product.
I aggree with your gr alignment, but giving a prod:Product will also infer that it is a gr:Product I guess.
Den 12. jul. 2017 11.31 AM skrev "Georg Ferdinand Schneider" < notifications@github.com>:
I think we might have here some overlap with existing approaches on publishing product data using Semantic Web technologies (SWT) here. Namely this involves the following established and published ontologies, also specifically for BUILDINGS:
GoodRelations http://www.heppnetz.de/ontologies/goodrelations/v1.html FreeClassOWL http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.html BauDataWeb http://semantic.eurobau.com/
The effort linked to above focusses up to now on construction materials, however in particular the reusing the high level description of GoodRelation ontology should be stipulated also in our approach.
[image: GR class diagram] https://camo.githubusercontent.com/fd9cd6a1e34e1f07434f625b8216e7d644085877/687474703a2f2f7777772e686570706e65747a2e64652f6f6e746f6c6f676965732f676f6f6472656c6174696f6e732f676f6f6472656c6174696f6e732d554d4c2e706e67
Considering the GR ontology I would suggest the following alignments:
prod:Product rdfs:subClassOf gr:ProductOrService . prod:property rdfs:subPropertyOf gr:quantitativeProductOrServiceproperty .
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/product/issues/1, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM-4EWOSWSku35-iyz2NnAn-sDvi6YAEks5sNIRdgaJpZM4OVS1x .
Alright then the statement
prod:Product rdfs:subClassOf gr:ProductOrService .
should make sense.
However your statement
but giving a prod:Product will also infer that it is a gr:Product I guess.
is not clear to me as there is no concept gr:Product. Did you meant gr:ProductOrService?
gr:ProductOrService was what I meant. I have added the alignment now. Please see the development branch. Also the MEP module is exploding right now :)
2017-07-12 11:05 GMT+02:00 Georg Ferdinand Schneider < notifications@github.com>:
Alright then the statement
prod:Product rdfs:subClassOf gr:ProductOrService .
should make sense.
However your statement but giving a prod:Product will also infer that it is a gr:Product I guess. is not clear to me as there is no concept gr:Product
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c-lbd-cg/product/issues/1#issuecomment-314701979, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AM-4EUfDQhdh3hX4hYiAdAxypfNM12WTks5sNIw_gaJpZM4OVS1x .
Mads Holten Rasmussen Civilingeniør, Bygningsdesign M.Sc. Architectural Engineering
fixed with commit a6297e37706508cd30384afdd88ec59898f32944
I think we might have here some overlap with existing approaches on publishing product data using Semantic Web technologies (SWT) here. Namely this involves the following established and published ontologies, also specifically for BUILDINGS:
GoodRelations FreeClassOWL BauDataWeb
The effort linked to above focusses up to now on construction materials, however in particular the reusing the high level description of GoodRelation ontology should be stipulated also in our approach.
see also
Hepp, Martin. "Goodrelations: An ontology for describing products and services offers on the web." Knowledge Engineering: Practice and Patterns (2008): 329-346.
Considering the GR ontology I would suggest the following alignments:
prod:Product rdfs:subClassOf gr:ProductOrService . prod:property rdfs:subPropertyOf gr:quantitativeProductOrServiceproperty .