search

w3c-social / social-vocab

Experiment with maintaining a living vocabulary
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
15 stars 3 forks source link

Question about vocabularies #3

Closed parklize closed 9 years ago

parklize commented 9 years ago

Hi @elf-pavlik.

  1. What's the relation between the living vocabularies here and the page below? Since the page below is trying to match (or propose) existing vocabularies to user stories but here (in GitHub) seems are defining new terms.

https://www.w3.org/wiki/Socialig/Vocabulary_TF/Mapping_API_User_Stories_to_Vocabulary_terms

Will these terms defined in GitHub matched later with existing ones proposed in the page or...

  1. The qualified relation is very interesting which is creating recourse for the relationship, as the example in the link you shared below [1]. I'm wondering if the relationship property appears in the resource again is necessary and maybe the rdf:subject, rdf:object should be replaced by the relevant property of the qualified relation as well like ex:partner in the example since rdf:Statement, rdf:subject, rdf:predicate, rdf:object are used for reification [2]?

[1]. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/qualified-relation.html [2]. http://www.obitko.com/tutorials/ontologies-semantic-web/rdf-elements.html

Qualified relation example in the link [1]:

eg:bob a foaf:Person. eg:mary a foaf:Person.

_:bobMaryMarriage a ex:Marriage; ex:partner eg:bob; ex:partner eg:mary; ex:date "2009-04-01"^^xsd:date.

Take the qualified relation of "Following" as an example:

https://wwelves.org/perpetual-tripper/rel/3242 a :Following ; as:actor (or other newly defined property) https://wwelves.org/perpetual-tripper ; as:object (or other newly defined property) https:/rhiaro.co.uk ; :startTime "16 July 2014" .

elf-pavlik commented 9 years ago

Hi @parklize

I see need to align work on Social WG wiki and in this repository. Here I mostly wanted to focus on visualizing the actual graphs. I also hope that we can reuse as much as possible from existing terms and make this repsitory more of an extended documentation.

I don't have clear strategy for Qualified Relation yet. We should also take a look at [schema:Role](http://schema.org/Role]

schema:Role

schema:Role

In next days I will not stay very responsive here, hitchhiking for our face 2 face in Paris...

parklize commented 9 years ago

Sure, we could discuss it in more detail next week.