The RDF/SPARQL approach has been introduced as an alternative to the standard RDF reification approach for capturing and querying annotations associated with individual triples. During the W3C Workshop on Web Standardization for Graph Data, several workshop attendees agreed to support the specification of this new approach in the form of a W3C member submission. Since then, the plan has changed slightly: Instead of a member submission, the idea now is to specify the approach in a W3C Community Group report. In agreement with @danbri, who chairs the RDF-DEV CG (with which this github repo is associated), this effort will be organized under the umbrella of that CG. This github issue is meant to serve as a reminder of this effort.
Once the first draft of the report has been uploaded into that directory, I suggest to open separate issues that focus on specific aspects of that draft. Additionally, for general discussions of the RDF/SPARQL approach, we have a mailing list at: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/
The RDF/SPARQL approach has been introduced as an alternative to the standard RDF reification approach for capturing and querying annotations associated with individual triples. During the W3C Workshop on Web Standardization for Graph Data, several workshop attendees agreed to support the specification of this new approach in the form of a W3C member submission. Since then, the plan has changed slightly: Instead of a member submission, the idea now is to specify the approach in a W3C Community Group report. In agreement with @danbri, who chairs the RDF-DEV CG (with which this github repo is associated), this effort will be organized under the umbrella of that CG. This github issue is meant to serve as a reminder of this effort.
I have created a directory within this github repo to work on the document(s) for the report: https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/tree/master/RDFstar
Once the first draft of the report has been uploaded into that directory, I suggest to open separate issues that focus on specific aspects of that draft. Additionally, for general discussions of the RDF/SPARQL approach, we have a mailing list at: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/