Closed TimothyGu closed 7 years ago
Marked as non-substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.
I marked this as non-substantive, but apologies if this process is usually done by a WG member rather than the PR author like myself.
Wow, seems like a major security hole in the tooling. (Reported in W3C IRC #sysreq.) Can you also generate the HTML output? Then I can commit it.
@annevk Done.
Thanks for doing this by the way. This should be indexed within 24h.
@annevk, anyone can refresh validation and mark as non-substantive any PR that is not accepted yet. eg, the “ipr details” that are visible on WICG/animation-worklet#44 and WICG/budget-api#12 take you to the corresponding repo-manager page, where any user user can perform those actions. Chairs can still decide whether that makes sense or not, request further IPR commitments, etc.
That seems like a very strange model.
@annevk: I imagine @darobin adopted the simple/optimistic approach to security, and erred on the side of letting users do sensible things by default, instead of restricting actions too much.
There's no security with this model though. You might as well not have the check, since everything depends on the chairs.
This term is used in the URL Standard.