xsd:int vs xsd:integer

[VladimirAlexiev]

https://w3c.github.io/N3/spec/#h-note-6

Integers, decimals, doubles, and booleans may also be written as string literals with the appropriate datatype IRI (e.g., "8"^^xsd:int or "true"^^xsd:boolean).

I think this should be changed to

Integers, decimals, doubles, and booleans may also be written as string literals with the appropriate datatype IRI (e.g., "8"^^xsd:integer or "true"^^xsd:boolean).

because:

• xsd:int must be specified,
• the earlier https://w3c.github.io/N3/spec/#example-9 shows "Integers, decimals, doubles, and booleans" and correctly states:

  :atomicNumber 2 ;               # xsd:integer

[domel]

Good catch. We should we following RDF 1.1, where xsd:integeris defined as a core datatype.

[VladimirAlexiev]

@domel what is "core"?

[domel]

See RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (The XML Schema Built-in Datatypes).

[william-vw]

fixed by https://github.com/w3c/N3/pull/155