Closed csarven closed 7 months ago
The intended audience of a specification is crucial. This is a very important fix that the WebID Specification doc needs.
/chair hat off
+1 from me as-is.
which could be adapted as the spec progresses
Absolutely, but this is a good starting point.
@TallTed,
"name" rather than "denote" for consistency with the overarching theme of the spec.
Why are there pull requests against the old ed spec?
The CG is focussed on creating new documents.
Why are there pull requests against the old ed spec?
Because relatively few relatively small changes to the old Editors Draft are expected to result in a document which can garner consensus approval.
The CG is focussed on creating new documents.
Where does anything say that?
@kidehen's later suggestion has been applied to my change request.
/chair hat on
@csarven would you be ok with me forking this and rebasing on main to maintain your contribution?
EDIT: result would look like https://github.com/jacoscaz/WebID/tree/docs/audience
Closing in favor of #56 .
Clarifying who this specification is for signals to the reader whether and what they might be able to get out of this specification. This text - which could be adapted as the spec progresses - can also serve as an editorial guide on expressing certain notions and structuring.