Closed jacoscaz closed 3 months ago
Thank you for reviewing, @TallTed! I'll merge your suggestions tomorrow. I hadn't focused on the small details, yet, as I am unsure as to whether this PR should actually be merged or not. Feedback in #20 is very close, perhaps too close to justify changing the status quo, and I had hoped that opening the PR would have invited more feedback to tilt the balance one way or another.
I remain on the side of keeping WebID Profile Document
. But if the change is made at all, I think it should be applied consistently.
... I had hoped that opening the PR would have invited more feedback to tilt the balance one way or another.
Okey dokey - so I'll just re-iterate my comment from #20 (https://github.com/w3c/WebID/issues/20#issuecomment-2022617258), i.e.:
"Strong preference for WebID Document
over WebID Profile Document
- so +1 to removing Profile."
And yeah, I totally agree with @TallTed's assertion above that the change should be made consistently throughout.
This PR addresses the change requested in #20 . While there appears to be a slightly greater consensus in favor of
WebID Document
overWebID Profile Document
, the difference is so small that feedback to this PR might tilt the balance towards the latter and negate the need for a change. Let's see what happens.This PR does not introduce any breaking change. Setting the deadline for review in two weeks, on 2024-04-01.
Do not bother reviewing the
spec/identity/index.html
as that's automatically updated by our current CI setup based on the contents ofspec/identity/index.bs
. We'll sort this out in a separate issue / PR.Links to the rendered files: