Note that the APA WG prefers groups to run a self-review around the time of FPWD. Let us know when you have done it. Get advice on how to do that at https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html.
If you still want us to review your spec, please provide the information below.
In the issue title above add the document name followed by the date of this request.
name of spec to be reviewed: Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.3
Do you need a reply by a particular date? Ideally beginning of March
Please point to the results of your own self-review (see https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html): No specific pointers. We went through the questionaire and found no issues.
daniel-montalvo
commented
1 month ago
Note that the APA WG prefers groups to run a self-review around the time of FPWD. Let us know when you have done it. Get advice on how to do that at https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html.
If you still want us to review your spec, please provide the information below.
In the issue title above add the document name followed by the date of this request.
name of spec to be reviewed: Accessible Rich Internet Applications 1.3
URL of spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria-1.3/
Do you need a reply by a particular date? Ideally beginning of March
Please point to the results of your own self-review (see https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html): No specific pointers. We went through the questionaire and found no issues.
Where and how to file issues arising? https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/new/choose
Pointer to any explainer for the spec? https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/aria/
Other comments: