matatk
commented
3 months ago APA WG is happy to sign off on this document; we note the document makes the importance of accessibility (and other HR areas) prominent.
Our members had some editorial thoughts/suggestions which may be filed as issues on the repo in due course. Consensus is that we're happy to see this document progress as-is.
Thanks to @newtonsgroove for helping with APA's review.
In the issue title above add the document name followed by the date of this request, then the date of your proposed deadline for comments.
name of spec to be reviewed: Ethical Web Principles
URL of spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/DNOTE-ethical-web-principles-20240319/
Current Rec/Note phase? wide review prior to Statement
What and when is your next expected transition? from Note to Statement.. sometime this Summer
What has changed since any previous review? First formal accessibility review
Please point to the results of your self-review: I think this document does not appear to fit into any of the categories listed in the self-review, however I am happy to revisit if I'm wrong.
Where and how to file issues arising? Please fils issues on our repo https://github.com/w3ctag/ethical-web-principles/
Pointer to any explainer for the spec? I don't think this is applicable
Other comments: As with the Privacy Principles doc, we are in new territory here regarding wide review of statement track documents so please feel free to let me know if you'd prefer to this review request to come in another form.