w3c / accname

Accessible Name and Description Computation
https://w3c.github.io/accname/
61 stars 23 forks source link

Update to Condition for step 2C #90

Closed OisinNolan closed 2 months ago

OisinNolan commented 4 years ago

This PR is motivated by the fact that many (all?) AccName implementations interpret step 2E in this manner. See example: image


:boom: Error: 500 Internal Server Error :boom:

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on May 16, 2021, 3:07 PM UTC).

More PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one: :rotating_light: [Spec Generator](https://www.w3.org/2015/labs/) - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec. :link: [Related URL](https://labs.w3.org/spec-generator/?type=respec&url=https%3A%2F%2Frawcdn.githack.com%2FOisinNolan%2Faccname%2Fbeeb3d59364035373d642da35b6a6dc4e3bf323d%2Findex.html%3FisPreview%3Dtrue) ``` 😭 Sorry, there was an error generating the HTML. Please report this issue! Specification: https://rawcdn.githack.com/OisinNolan/accname/beeb3d59364035373d642da35b6a6dc4e3bf323d/index.html?isPreview=true&publishDate=2021-05-16 ReSpec version: 25.6.0 File a bug: https://github.com/w3c/respec/ Error: Error: Evaluation failed: Timeout: document.respec.ready didn't resolve in 27421ms. at ExecutionContext._evaluateInternal (/u/spec-generator/node_modules/puppeteer/lib/cjs/puppeteer/common/ExecutionContext.js:221:19) at runMicrotasks () at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:93:5) at async ExecutionContext.evaluate (/u/spec-generator/node_modules/puppeteer/lib/cjs/puppeteer/common/ExecutionContext.js:110:16) at async generateHTML (/u/spec-generator/node_modules/respec/tools/respecDocWriter.js:276:12) at async toHTML (/u/spec-generator/node_modules/respec/tools/respecDocWriter.js:92:18) at async Object.generate [as respec] (/u/spec-generator/generators/respec.js:14:44) at async /u/spec-generator/server.js:205:44 ``` _If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please [file an issue](https://github.com/tobie/pr-preview/issues/new?title=Error%20not%20surfaced%20properly&body=See%20w3c/accname%2390.)._

Preview | Diff

MelSumner commented 3 years ago

@jnurthen please add to next week's agenda.

jnurthen commented 3 years ago

Next meeting is on 27 may. No meeting this week due to GAAD.

MelSumner commented 2 years ago

Also @accdc I think I have resolved the merge conflicts so this is probably ready for you to review. 👍

accdc commented 11 months ago

I agree, The text "whose value can be adjusted by the user" should be removed, and simply refer to control which will include all such variations.

jnurthen commented 10 months ago

How does this PR relate to #183 ?

MelSumner commented 2 months ago

We've moved ACCNAME spec to a mono repo: https://github.com/w3c/aria

If you still want this to be considered for ACCNAME, please re-open this PR there.