search

w3c / activitypub

http://w3c.github.io/activitypub/
Other
1.24k stars 78 forks source link

PDF version of standard #428

Closed AaronNGray closed 7 months ago

AaronNGray commented 8 months ago

Is it possible to provide a PDF version of the draft standard ?

nightpool commented 8 months ago

you can print to PDF from both Chrome and Firefox. I think respec should come with built in @print stylesheets, but if there are improvements we can upstream those.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024, 1:35 AM Aaron Gray @.***> wrote:

Is it possible to provide a PDF version of the draft standard ?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/428, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABZCVY363BWLVA7NM64RSDYX7XU5AVCNFSM6AAAAABETRPF46VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE4DGMRSGQ3TSNY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

TallTed commented 8 months ago

you can print to PDF from both Chrome and Firefox

And on macOS, from any browser that supports the system's print dialog/features.

tesaguri commented 8 months ago

As a precedent, documents from the OWL Working Group have non-normative PDF versions, e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-quick-reference-20121211/. The PDF versions seem to have been exported from a Web browser, however.

evanp commented 7 months ago

I'll investigate if the W3C hosts PDF versions of specification documents, and if we can, I'll create a PDF version.

We'll also need a link to the PDF version from the main HTML version.

evanp commented 7 months ago

@AaronNGray given that there are many ways for a reader to do this, what's the incentive for creating a PDF on the authoring side?

AaronNGray commented 7 months ago

@evanp Yes, I have used the browser printing facility. I have just used an embeeded link on RFC's and a lot of W3C in the past. But using a browser is fine I did not realize there was internal printing media type markup. I will cloe this issue, thanks.