w3c / activitystreams

Activity Streams 2.0
https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/
Other
276 stars 61 forks source link

Add to criteria for "Process for Including Extensions in Activity Streams 2.0"? #547

Open torgo opened 10 months ago

torgo commented 10 months ago

Please Indicate One:

Please Describe the Issue:

As discussed in the CG meeting today, would it make sense to add to the criteria anything around I18N, A11Y or security / privacy review? As an example, in TAG we ask people to fill in this issue template when they request a review. I'm not suggesting you need to do anything as heavy-weight as that, but something lighter weight around these topics might be appropriate.

evanp commented 9 months ago

@torgo so, I added a section to the criteria for doing security, privacy, a11y and i18n reviews.