Based on issue #444 I've added an erratum to show what's potentially the correct value for the type in example 102.
There's some dispute about whether this example is strictly incorrect, and if therefore it's actually an editorial error that belongs in the ERRATA. It's definitely better form, and the lack of a type property is not the point of the example. I'll leave this open to the CG for advice or a decision.
Based on issue #444 I've added an erratum to show what's potentially the correct value for the type in example 102.
There's some dispute about whether this example is strictly incorrect, and if therefore it's actually an editorial error that belongs in the ERRATA. It's definitely better form, and the lack of a type property is not the point of the example. I'll leave this open to the CG for advice or a decision.