w3c / alreq

Documenting gaps and requirements for support of Arabic and Persian on the Web and in eBooks.
Other
60 stars 31 forks source link

Further rewriting of the Writing Styles section #238

Closed TitusNemeth closed 3 years ago

TitusNemeth commented 3 years ago

Preview | Diff

shervinafshar commented 3 years ago

Thanks for the edits @TitusNemeth. I'm assuming that we could cite your book for the edits made to this section. Is that accurate? I checked and we don't have your book in the list of reference. Do let me know and I will add the information for this edition to the document and our list of references.

r12a commented 3 years ago

These changes look good to me, and i like that the approach to the historical information is a little more systematic.

shervinafshar commented 3 years ago

Yeah. Looks good to me too. Waiting for response regarding citation before we can merge.

shervinafshar commented 3 years ago

@ntounsi, since this section was mostly your text, I added you as a reviewer as well. Please share your thoughts. Thanks.

TitusNemeth commented 3 years ago

Hi Shervin,

I am awfully sorry, I forgot that I set up a server-side filter that put all alreq mails in a dedicated folder, so didn’t see your replies until now. Sorry for that.

To answer your question: no, my book is specifically about the 20th century and mechanical (machine) typography and its influences on Arabic type design. It may still be a relevant referencehttps://brill.com/view/title/32317. For the section on writing styles I consulted mainly on Gacek’s Vademecumhttps://brill.com/view/title/14879 and Blair’s Islamic Calligraphyhttps://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-islamic-calligraphy.html.

Best Titus

shervinafshar commented 3 years ago

Thank you, Titus. I'll add those to our list of references (currently maintained in a spreadsheet): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/137j59fPt1nkl0h6O72SR50SX3MHk0lWzmqcEaAmo1zM/edit#gid=0

TitusNemeth commented 3 years ago

Excellent, thank you Shervin. Titus