Closed pellared closed 5 months ago
Doesn't the baggage-octet
syntax need to be updated?
Doesn't the
baggage-octet
syntax need to be updated?
%
is still a valid character of baggage-octet
(syntax-wise). It has to be acceptable as it is needed for precent-encoding. The change is in the "semantics" how the %
character is handled.
If baggage-octet
would not accept %
then it would be not possible to precent-encode anything.
I am not sure why https://labs.w3.org/repo-manager/pr/id/w3c/baggage/125 is failing.
EDIT:
pellared did not make IPR commitments for this group. To make the IPR commitments, pellared should join the Distributed Tracing Working Group .
Do I have to be part of https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/distributed-tracing? Maybe I should mark my PR as non-substantive?
Bump.
@dyladan? 😉
Fixes https://github.com/w3c/baggage/issues/124
Preview | Diff