Consider whether the division into stand-alone approaches and multi-party approaches is still valuable, and wehther there is a better way of organizing the discussion.
After a conversation by e-mail, it was agreed by several of us that Cryptographic Attestation of Personhood doesn't fundamentally engage any third parties - at least, not in verifying the humanity of the individual user. However, also raised as part of this conversation was the question whether the stand-alone/third-party distinction is still valuable, and whether a different document structure would be better for future drafts.
Note: this issue does not affect the first public working draft, as was also agreed. It should be addressed only for subsequent drafts.
Consider whether the division into stand-alone approaches and multi-party approaches is still valuable, and wehther there is a better way of organizing the discussion.
After a conversation by e-mail, it was agreed by several of us that Cryptographic Attestation of Personhood doesn't fundamentally engage any third parties - at least, not in verifying the humanity of the individual user. However, also raised as part of this conversation was the question whether the stand-alone/third-party distinction is still valuable, and whether a different document structure would be better for future drafts.
Note: this issue does not affect the first public working draft, as was also agreed. It should be addressed only for subsequent drafts.