search

w3c / charter-webperf

Web Performance Group charter
https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/
27 stars 11 forks source link

incorporate AC review feedback #43

Closed igrigorik closed 6 years ago

igrigorik commented 6 years ago

@plehegar @siusin @toddreifsteck @yoavweiss PTAL.

I believe this should capture all of the outstanding feedback and questions from the AC review.

siusin commented 6 years ago

LGTM.

@wseltzer ping? plh is on vacation this week...

[1] comments from the AC review.

wseltzer commented 6 years ago

2 comments:

  1. Should the privacy consideration be stated more strongly? Instead of "The group reserves the right not to publish a specification if acceptable mitigation strategies cannot be found" say "The group should not publish a specification if acceptable mitigation strategies cannot be found."

  2. I don't think the decision policy edit addresses the comment, which asks that Calls for Consensus be called out explicitly. Is that something the group might do, for example by putting "call for consensus" into the subject header when sending minutes of meetings that contain resolutions?

igrigorik commented 6 years ago

Thanks for the feedback Wendy.

Should the privacy consideration be stated more strongly? Instead of "The group reserves the right not to publish a specification if acceptable mitigation strategies cannot be found" say "The group should not publish a specification if acceptable mitigation strategies cannot be found."

Practically speaking, I think they're stating the same thing, but I'm ok with proposed wording.

I don't think the decision policy edit addresses the comment, which asks that Calls for Consensus be called out explicitly. Is that something the group might do, for example by putting "call for consensus" into the subject header when sending minutes of meetings that contain resolutions?

The decision here was to tighten our requirements around publishing minutes, and improving our process to get those out in a timely fashion for everyone to review. I'm happy to follow "[dd/mm/yy] meeting minutes / call for consensus" convention for subject lines carrying link to the minutes.

@yoavweiss @toddreifsteck any objections?

igrigorik commented 6 years ago

Updated to capture the above feedback.

@toddreifsteck @yoavweiss PTAL. If this looks good, I think we're good to merge.

yoavweiss commented 6 years ago

LGTM. Good to merge from my perspective

igrigorik commented 6 years ago

Thanks Yoav.

@toddreifsteck I'll let you do the last pass and merge if this looks reasonable. :)

toddreifsteck commented 6 years ago

LGTM. Merging!