w3c / coga

Cognitive and Learning Disabilities Accessibility Task Force deliverables
Other
66 stars 28 forks source link

EO comments: In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following #203

Closed ruoxiran closed 3 years ago

ruoxiran commented 4 years ago

This issue split from #199 -3 In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following (with their potential updates from the COGA TF): • The Business Case for Digital Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/business-case/ • Older Users and Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/older-users/ In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences introduction that points to the following (with their updates from the COGA TF): • Cognitive and learning disabilities section of Diverse Abilities and Barriers in How People with Disabilities Use the Web https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers/#cognitive • (maybe) Accessibility, Usability, and Inclusion https://www.w3.org/WAI/fundamentals/accessibility-usability-inclusion/ . In the Introduction, add a 1-3 sentences that introduces the relevance for cognitive accessibility and points to the following (with their potential updates from the COGA TF): • Involving Users in Web Projects for Better, Easier Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning/involving-users/ • Involving Users in Evaluating Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/involving-users/ • (and maybe Planning and Managing Web Accessibility https://www.w3.org/WAI/planning-and-managing/ )

sharronrush commented 3 years ago

@rachaelbradley @lseeman Discussion of 11 January led to agreement to add referential sentences in specific sections of Content Usable that point to WAI resources. Would it be acceptable/useful for EO to draft suggested wording for those pointer sentences within the Bus/Policy section and the Usability section?

rachaelbradley commented 3 years ago

We welcome suggested text and will bring it to the COGA meeting for discussion once you provide it. Thank you!

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:35 PM sharronrush notifications@github.com wrote:

@rachaelbradley https://github.com/rachaelbradley @lseeman https://github.com/lseeman Discussion of 11 January led to agreement to add referential sentences in specific sections of Content Usable that point to WAI resources. Would it be acceptable/useful for EO to draft suggested wording for those pointer snetences?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/w3c/coga/issues/203#issuecomment-759605664, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFBUPBVABK4EULDDB4ZGXWLSZXKX3ANCNFSM4S4EYLEQ .

shawna-slh commented 3 years ago

From EOWG Survey Unaddressed Issues [UPDATED question]

Several links were added throughout the document. Maybe not all?

rachaelbradley commented 3 years ago

We have added the links agreed to in the joint chair calls and are happy to explore adding others to our developer resource pages which are outside of the document.